IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Peter Saint-Andre's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29: (withDISCUSS and COMMENT)

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 15 November 2011 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0DE11E8088; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:16:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a4Dzmy5VUpsv; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AD111E808D; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.82] (203-69-99-17.HINET-IP.hinet.net [203.69.99.17] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFNFQGj016714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC2F28C.6070600@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:15:24 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
References: <20110922020938.20266.40068.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <63F5863A798FF74A8817FB17814063DD67AF16@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net> <4E7B38C3.2050406@stpeter.im> <4E7B5EE6.1060907@stpeter.im> <5B0CB394-6313-45A1-AA0A-EC6C130BFCC9@isi.edu> <4EC1EE3C.8050301@stpeter.im> <7EB553A7-D861-418A-93AF-A823CE9C85F3@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <7EB553A7-D861-418A-93AF-A823CE9C85F3@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis@tools.ietf.org, dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "Korhonen, Jouni (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <jouni.korhonen@nsn.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Peter Saint-Andre's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29: (withDISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:16:14 -0000

I think we're meeting at the message board today at 3pm

Joe

On 11/15/2011 3:11 PM, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
> ngly) have some thoughts on service naming.
>
> Here's my availability:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email