Re: [port-srv-reg] Fwd: Re: [DNSOP] New version of document for review

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org> Fri, 10 December 2010 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D40028C15E for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:32:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKiGXBERPJBH for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768C528C11E for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:33:43 -0800
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:33:40 -0800
Thread-Topic: [port-srv-reg] Fwd: Re: [DNSOP] New version of document for review
Thread-Index: AcuV8QMYS9KoDpk1S/CqssKK8ctNogA/ZbgnAEbq+ys=
Message-ID: <C926C374.29BD6%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <C924E788.29A63%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.7.0.100913
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C926C37429BD6michellecottonicannorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Fwd: Re: [DNSOP] New version of document for review
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:32:19 -0000

I’ve just read through version 09 and the diff Lars sent around.  Before I send in final comments, is the diff found at file:///Users/michelle/Documents/Microsoft%20User%20Data/Saved%20Attachments/draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-from--09.diff.html the most up-to-date with all updates to date?

--Michelle

P.S. I really like the decision to use assignment based on the definitions Joe found.  Thank you!


On 12/8/10 7:43 AM, "Michelle Cotton" <michelle.cotton@icann.org> wrote:

I’ve allocated time today to review the diff that Lars sent here....
Hope to have any final comments/questions out by the end of today.

--Michelle


On 12/7/10 1:26 AM, "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@nokia.com> wrote:

FYI, I committed a version that fixes the nits that Tom Petch raised and also rolls in a few of Doug Barton's suggestions. Diff attached.

Lars