IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussion

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Wed, 08 September 2010 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FAA3A69F3 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id os+RXfdEkeFe for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F683A682E for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay14.apple.com (relay14.apple.com [17.128.113.52]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F366A71608A for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807134-b7cacae0000058e0-91-4c8800758e2c
Received: from et.apple.com (et.apple.com [17.151.62.12]) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 68.9C.22752.570088C4; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from [10.0.1.43] (c-24-6-164-127.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.164.127]) by et.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L8G00BED6ES5NB0@et.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <4C80B256.3090007@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:30:28 -0700
Message-id: <E40060CF-76CB-4B34-B7A4-F27F74C29A2B@apple.com>
References: <6EC7B8A7-C3B3-4E63-85A9-0DC31F4D45B4@nokia.com> <5D2DD7D7-A429-4CFC-BD27-EF09CEF5AE1B@apple.com> <29A788ED-1768-4BD8-B0BA-0D79C7B9843B@nokia.com> <4C80B256.3090007@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussion
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:30:04 -0000

On 3 Sep 2010, at 1:31, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>> agree that we should use one name for the registry throughout. Am OK with your proposal; the main reason I put port numbers first in the title was that historically, that was what the registry was known as, and I didn't want to confuse people.
>> 
> BTW, Alfred also raised this point, so changing the registry name would keep him happier.

Okay, done.

It's now "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry" throughout.

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email