IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Getting the document finished

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 16 December 2010 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9414B3A6977 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:44:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rH+LYbgtTJ5v for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780053A691B for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBGIkG1x029932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D0A5E78.8080501@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:46:16 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <C92D17C4.29E28%michelle.cotton@icann.org> <4D0A59E1.9030806@isode.com> <BB7B4198-9E7C-4680-9BCF-2CEABB5527D0@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB7B4198-9E7C-4680-9BCF-2CEABB5527D0@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: oBGIkG1x029932
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Getting the document finished
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:44:45 -0000

Yes.

On 12/16/2010 10:32 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> yes
>
> On 2010-12-16, at 20:26, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> Michelle Cotton wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Here are some questions/comments for the latest version of the document.
>>>
>>> I hope they are helpful.  Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification regarding my comments.
>>
>> Hi Michelle,
>> I think your comments are good, but most of them are mostly minor editorial stuff. I think they can be dealt with in parallel with IETF LC (unless other people agree).
>>
>> Are people generally happy with me taking the document to IETF LC at the beginning of January 2011?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alexey
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Port-srv-reg mailing list
>> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email