Re: [port-srv-reg] "assigned"

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 11 January 2010 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7123A69DE for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:21:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFkgX9Sc9n+O for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E772D3A67B3 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o0B7Hslg029526; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:18:07 -0600
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:17:55 +0200
Received: from mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:17:52 +0200
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o0B7HoJA027179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:17:51 +0200
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-60--728261866; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C746BC34.1E6A8%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:17:43 +0200
Message-Id: <6C77BDEE-0D03-45D0-8CCC-FFD67068EB3E@nokia.com>
References: <C746BC34.1E6A8%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.fit.nokia.com [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:17:44 +0200 (EET)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2010 07:17:52.0958 (UTC) FILETIME=[3076BDE0:01CA928E]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] "assigned"
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:21:55 -0000

Hi,

has there been any action around this wrt updating http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers? The page still says:

	The range for assigned ports managed by the IANA is 0-1023.
and
	The Registered Ports are in the range 1024-49151.

After our discussion, I understand that registered and assigned mean the same thing, right? So the former should probably be change to "system" or "well known" ports. There should probably also be a sentence in the beginning of the page that clarifies that IANA manages to ports from 0-49151.

Lars

PS: CC'ing Fernando, since this is relevant for his port-randomization draft.



On 2009-12-11, at 0:54, Michelle Cotton wrote:

> In the ports registry the ranges are described as follows:
> 
> System (Well-Known) Port Numbers 0-1023
> User (Registered) Port Numbers   1024-49152
> 
> Maybe that was meant to say “system” ports or as Joe said, maybe the range should be corrected.
> 
> Michelle
> 
> On 12/4/09 1:58 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch@ISI.EDU> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>> From http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers:
>> 
>>> WELL KNOWN PORT NUMBERS
>>> 
>>> The Well Known Ports are assigned by the IANA and on most systems can
>>> only be used by system (or root) processes or by programs executed by
>>> privileged users.
>>> 
>>> Ports are used in the TCP [RFC793] to name the ends of logical
>>> connections which carry long term conversations.  For the purpose of
>>> providing services to unknown callers, a service contact port is
>>> defined.  This list specifies the port used by the server process as
>>> its contact port.  The contact port is sometimes called the
>>> "well-known port".
>>> 
>>> To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with the
>>> UDP [RFC768].
>>> 
>>> The range for assigned ports managed by the IANA is 0-1023.
>> 
>> What does "assigned" mean here? The ports from 1023-49152 are also "assigned", no?
> 
> IMO that's a typo.
> 
> Assigned range is 0-49151
> 
> Joe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAksZhiEACgkQE5f5cImnZrthbACcCi9lZjLTdDk7kGuCy0J9CKQA
> vM8AoL5MgfxM6/VnTCRIWVY5fJAsyE0O
> =DPw4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg
>