Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 07 September 2010 21:02 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8C70B3A6981 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-102.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYubPG0UU98n for
<port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7153A6956 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>;
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.217.225.25] (25.sub-75-217-225.myvzw.com [75.217.225.25])
(authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id
o87L1VSl024282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NOT); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C86A82C.3020205@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:01:32 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Mcfadden <mark.mcfadden@icann.org>
References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D341083169@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D341083169@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: o87L1VSl024282
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port
registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:02:09 -0000
Only one point... - I don't see why we care about consecutive hyphens; prohibiting that should be dropped Joe On 9/7/2010 1:51 PM, Mark Mcfadden wrote: > The most recent version in the repository has the changes suggested by Michelle and Pearl. The attachment has the before and after language. Of course, a simple diff is also going to provide you with a view of the small changes that were made. They were: > > - clarity in the introduction about the authority for registering port numbers and service names; > - the need to prohibit multiple consecutive hyphens in the service name; and, > - consistency of the contact and registration language in Section 8. > > mark > > Mark McFadden > mark.mcfadden@icann.org > IANA Resource Specialist
- [port-srv-reg] Making progress Mark Mcfadden
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress Mark Mcfadden
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Making progress Stuart Cheshire