IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussion

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259EC3A6885 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itAK+Gx0Plgt for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC9E3A6881 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E81ADFE5D9 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807137-b7b43ae00000547d-b5-4c883ca0a5ab
Received: from elliott.apple.com (elliott.apple.com [17.151.62.13]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id AA.14.21629.0AC388C4; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Received: from [10.0.1.201] ([24.6.164.127]) by elliott.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L8G00BIIIAOKC80@elliott.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <4C80B256.3090007@isode.com>
References: <6EC7B8A7-C3B3-4E63-85A9-0DC31F4D45B4@nokia.com> <5D2DD7D7-A429-4CFC-BD27-EF09CEF5AE1B@apple.com> <29A788ED-1768-4BD8-B0BA-0D79C7B9843B@nokia.com> <4C80B256.3090007@isode.com>
Message-id: <E91B6B8D-F2CB-4A43-9F51-4D39472CCC1C@apple.com>
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:47:57 -0700
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussion
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:46:46 -0000

On 3 Sep 2010, at 1:31 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>>> Would it be better to strictly use the terms "System Ports" and  
>>> "User Ports" to denote the ranges, and keep the term "registered  
>>> port" to just mean generically, "recorded by IANA in the Registry"?
>>>
>> We can also use the term "assigned" instead of "registered" in the  
>> second case.
>>
> Works for me.


This is now also done and checked into svn.

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email