Re: [port-srv-reg] ACTION ITEMS - final updates - ports doc

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

FWIW, my remaining issue dealt with the list of registration info, as below.

Changes indicated by comments.

Joe

Lars Eggert wrote:

>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - names for table entries to coordinate with Olafur's tables
>>
>> Joe:
>>
>> Will clarify list of table entries and ensure they are described
>> completely in the current doc.
>>
>> (PS - here's my input)
>> The current list of registration information is listed in Section 8.1:
>>
>>      Registration Administrative Contact (REQUIRED)
>>      Registration Technical Contact (REQUIRED)
>>      Service Name (REQUIRED)
>>      Port Number (OPTIONAL)
>>      Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED if port number requested)

I think we agreed to make this "(REQUIRED)" in all cases.

>>      Service Code (only REQUIRED for DCCP)
>>      Description (REQUIRED)
>>      Reference (REQUIRED)

It might be useful to move the service name and transport protocol to
the top of the list, and indicate that the pair are the "key", i.e.,
they define the service.

I would suggest adding the following two OPTIONAL fields to the set
above, which are NOT provided by the applicant:

	Known Unauthorized Uses
	Assignment comments (de-registration, owner/name change, etc.)

Joe