Re: [port-srv-reg] Getting the document finished

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 16 December 2010 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2A23A6981 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:33:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XM8aXzjdxMGP for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20693A6927 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oBGIWmfV030256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:32:50 +0200
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-30-684548207; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D0A59E1.9030806@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:32:40 +0200
Message-Id: <BB7B4198-9E7C-4680-9BCF-2CEABB5527D0@nokia.com>
References: <C92D17C4.29E28%michelle.cotton@icann.org> <4D0A59E1.9030806@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:32:46 +0200 (EET)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Getting the document finished
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:33:55 -0000

yes

On 2010-12-16, at 20:26, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Michelle Cotton wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Here are some questions/comments for the latest version of the document.
>> 
>> I hope they are helpful.  Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification regarding my comments.
> 
> Hi Michelle,
> I think your comments are good, but most of them are mostly minor editorial stuff. I think they can be dealt with in parallel with IETF LC (unless other people agree).
> 
> Are people generally happy with me taking the document to IETF LC at the beginning of January 2011?
> 
> Regards,
> Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg