Re: [port-srv-reg] SHORT name (14 CHARACTER MAXIMUM)

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org> Tue, 30 August 2011 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260A021F8E55 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9gUb14us0Vl for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31E521F8E52 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:58:45 -0700
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:58:41 -0700
Thread-Topic: [port-srv-reg] SHORT name (14 CHARACTER MAXIMUM)
Thread-Index: AcxnW1WRqdN8Esu7RgiWo7bMwsSp3wADQbCi
Message-ID: <CA82B931.34EB4%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E5D5515.8030203@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.10.0.110428
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] SHORT name (14 CHARACTER MAXIMUM)
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:57:18 -0000

I'm waiting on my web person to finish the form.  I pinged him today.
I'll let you know what the ETA is.

--Michelle


On 8/30/11 2:24 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

> Hi, Stuart,
> 
> Yes - the form that's up right now is incorrect. I am hoping we can fix
> that very soon, and don't know why we haven't already posted the new
> form (which we do send to applicants after they apply). I'm not sure
> what we can do other than wait for that change and encourage it to
> happen soon.
> 
> Some suggestions below...
> 
> On 8/29/2011 8:30 PM, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
>> On 27 Aug 2011, at 7:50, Joe Touch wrote:
>> 
>>> FWIW, this form has not been updated to the new template. IANA is sending
>>> applicants the new template by email right now.
>>> 
>>> (I'm not sure if this is because the RFC hasn't been published, or just them
>>> catching up on updates)
>> 
>> I have updated the<http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html>  to say:
>> 
>>> This temporary registry of DNS SRV (RFC 2782) Service Names is now closed to
>>> new entries.
>>> 
>>> This temporary registry operated from 2003 to 2010, because during that time
>>> the IANA assignment procedures did not allow for registration of a service
>>> name without an associated port number.
>>> 
>>> The IANA assignment procedures have now been updated to allow registration
>>> of a service name without an associated port number. For more information
>>> see draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports, soon-to-be RFC 6335.
>>> 
>>> If you already sent a Service Name registration request that does not appear
>>> in this list, it has been forwarded to IANA for inclusion in the new Unified
>>> Service Name and Port Number Registry. Please be patient while IANA
>>> processes the backlog and records these new entries.
>>> 
>>> If you have a new Service Name you wish to register, you can now do this
>>> directly through IANA.
>>> 
>>> <http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl>
>> 
>> However, right now, that link is not terribly helpful. When a
>> developer goes to the wrong page to register their service type, I
>> redirect them to the wrong form to register their service type. For now
>> should the<http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html> page be saying
>> something different, until the IANA pages are updated?
> 
> You might point out that the current pages are being updated and that
> additional information is already requested after the initial form is
> completed.
> 
>> In July and August (prior to me updating the page) we received 25
>> new registration requests, so we seem to be averaging about three
>> new requests per week. I don't want to be giving confusing guidance
>> to too many developers.
> 
> Agreed and appreciated! The note above might help until the form is changed.
> 
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg