IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"

Mark Mcfadden <mark.mcfadden@icann.org> Thu, 09 September 2010 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.mcfadden@icann.org>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F153A68F2 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmvSiy4gCbDE for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBE43A6860 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:43:06 -0700
From: Mark Mcfadden <mark.mcfadden@icann.org>
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:42:34 -0700
Thread-Topic: Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"
Thread-Index: ActPwd4HCenA4CquRX+zXMYkNOg69AAa1+hD
Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D34108316E@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
References: <11ED4B07-AABE-4F4F-BED0-41BBDBF2ABE8@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <11ED4B07-AABE-4F4F-BED0-41BBDBF2ABE8@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:42:48 -0000

I need to go through and change the rest of the document so that it is consistent.
Let me do that later today.

mark

Mark McFadden
mark.mcfadden@icann.org
IANA Resource Specialist
________________________________________
From: Stuart Cheshire [cheshire@apple.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:54 PM
To: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Mcfadden
Subject: Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"

I see that Mark Mcfadden's checkin yesterday changed:

@@ -874,8 +878,8 @@
              <t>
              Service Name (REQUIRED)<vspace />
              Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED)<vspace />
-            Registration Administrative Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
-            Registration Technical Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
+            Registrant (REQUIRED)<vspace />
+            Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
              Description (REQUIRED)<vspace />
              Reference (REQUIRED)<vspace />
              Port Number (OPTIONAL)<vspace />

However, other places in the document still refer to "Administrative
Contact" and "Technical Contact", which no longer make sense.

Why was this changed? Do we need to reverse this change, or change
the rest of the document to be consistent?

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email