IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA5C3A69A6 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pEY+92dG0odb for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807AC3A6781 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay15.apple.com (relay15.apple.com [17.128.113.54]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EA2ADC25D0; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7b3eae0000066cf-02-4c86caa02a28
Received: from [17.202.46.71] (chesh1.apple.com [17.202.46.71]) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id B9.82.26319.0AAC68C4; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C8689C6.7080000@isi.edu>
References: <6EC7B8A7-C3B3-4E63-85A9-0DC31F4D45B4@nokia.com> <58FA4E25-57CE-4D07-BFBA-A708F3616128@apple.com> <4C812B37.1030504@isi.edu> <675AFB53-CFEC-4BC1-9C9E-EF6D12529E37@apple.com> <4C8689C6.7080000@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <DF79B5CA-2A70-47CA-A9FE-C5AA1D48302A@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:28:31 -0700
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:28:05 -0000

On 7 Sep, 2010, at 11:51, Joe Touch wrote:

>>>> This implies that a given service name can have *different* port
>>>> numbers assigned for different transport protocols.
>>>
>>> That is correct, and always has been.
>>
>> Can you give an example?
>
> DNS and NFS.

DNS is 53 on TCP and 53 on UDP.

NFS is 2049 on TCP and 2049 on UDP.

Can you give an example where a given service name has *different*  
port numbers assigned for TCP and UDP?

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email