Re: [port-srv-reg] SHORT name (14 CHARACTER MAXIMUM)

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDBF21F8AF7 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqWxtrQgdWVW for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C3621F8A96 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LQQ00BIP1Q053G2@mail-out.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c71ae0000014d0-81-4e5c57a175d1
Received: from kencur (kencur.apple.com [17.151.62.38]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 59.82.05328.1A75C5E4; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.15] (173-164-252-149-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.164.252.149]) by kencur.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LQQ00DHM1RAWV70@kencur.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <4E590422.5050201@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:30:45 -0700
Message-id: <83E929D8-B0AB-49A7-B3D3-47841D3AA194@apple.com>
References: <429E7E1A-3FE1-4796-B269-C04477CDB62F@apple.com> <4E590422.5050201@isi.edu>
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OTXdheIyfwYZZVhZd34QcGD2WLPnJ FMAYxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXxt/EmU8Fy/oqFN60bGA/zdDFyckgImEhsOXacCcIWk7hwbz1b FyMXh5BAO5PEzWXnmEESvAKCEj8m32PpYuTgYBaQlzh4XhYkzCygJfH9USsLRP0RJom+RzfA BgkL2Eo8OfSeHcRmAyp68fkKG4jNKaAu8eXQNUYQm0VAVeLd4T+sEIMkJU6vuswOsctGYurx hSwgtpBApMT68+vBZooIyEo07v7GCnKDBJDdtCxjAqPALCTXzUK4bhaS6xYwMq9iFCxKzUms NDTRSywoyEnVS87P3cQICrmGQpMdjAd/8h9iFOBgVOLhnXkm2k+INbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO8N tRg/Id6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4ryFjpF+QgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsYsfm33 pcEFbVm3N78SS/Kevuv1z4hwoSZzpjhVj/22s5xMeuY7s3SxqH/91do7dYpM95erd5JSYhc5 WFSrBr/86HFI1GRmviPLhMpnWY8nq/B+1qu/KT+hTro228f091e7T+ctf/+5U54ZLnhp46y2 c0v6hLee1rvxeLeBYfHCivRw36fet5RYijMSDbWYi4oTAcF9NYU1AgAA
Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] SHORT name (14 CHARACTER MAXIMUM)
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:40:02 -0000

On 27 Aug 2011, at 7:50, Joe Touch wrote:

> FWIW, this form has not been updated to the new template. IANA is sending applicants the new template by email right now.
> 
> (I'm not sure if this is because the RFC hasn't been published, or just them catching up on updates)

I have updated the <http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html> to say:

> This temporary registry of DNS SRV (RFC 2782) Service Names is now closed to new entries.
> 
> This temporary registry operated from 2003 to 2010, because during that time the IANA assignment procedures did not allow for registration of a service name without an associated port number.
> 
> The IANA assignment procedures have now been updated to allow registration of a service name without an associated port number. For more information see draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports, soon-to-be RFC 6335.
> 
> If you already sent a Service Name registration request that does not appear in this list, it has been forwarded to IANA for inclusion in the new Unified Service Name and Port Number Registry. Please be patient while IANA processes the backlog and records these new entries.
> 
> If you have a new Service Name you wish to register, you can now do this directly through IANA.
> 
> <http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl>


However, right now, that link is not terribly helpful. When a developer goes to the wrong page to register their service type, I redirect them to the wrong form to register their service type. For now should the <http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html> page be saying something different, until the IANA pages are updated?

In July and August (prior to me updating the page) we received 25 new registration requests, so we seem to be averaging about three new requests per week. I don't want to be giving confusing guidance to too many developers.

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org