Re: [port-srv-reg] almost good to go

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 17 September 2010 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D043A697D for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SqruuO0j2cb for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C748C3A692A for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.217.198.68] (68.sub-75-217-198.myvzw.com [75.217.198.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8HMEchJ003340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C93E84E.8010404@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:14:38 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <EF4576A2-4342-4781-BC36-55AA77DB1CEE@nokia.com> <4C924866.2090707@isi.edu> <0D80A77F-A8CA-4F40-A27C-D011FD9096ED@nokia.com> <4C93D99C.5030503@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4C93D99C.5030503@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] almost good to go
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:14:48 -0000

PS - replace "proscribe" with "prescribe". My spell checker was over-eager.

Joe

On 9/17/2010 2:11 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> Some changes:
>
> - to avoid confusion between Registered (user) and system port numbers,
> I suggest using the term "assignment" for the process IANA performs
> (this is consistent, FWIW, with the IANA acronym)
>
> - I corrected the use of admin contact/tech contact use throughout
>
> - I replaced alias with overloading and corrected the text
> We do have some cases where multiple names map to the same number, so
> there is aliasing, but we do not have a case where one string ever maps
> to another string (which is what I would consider an alias). I replaced
> this with 'overloading', which is the more accurate CS term for what is
> happening.
>
> - corrected the ABNF, and simply indicated that it was provided as a
> non-normative convenience
>
> I'd be glad to put this into the XML if needed (I haven't been able to
> check it out, though - if someone can mail it to me, I'll do the changes
> over the weekend).
>
> Joe
>