Re: [port-srv-reg] ACTION ITEMS - final updates - ports doc

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On 2010-5-19, at 17:17, Joe Touch wrote:
> I.e., here are the specific changes:
> 
> <orig>
> 	Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED if port number requested)
> <new>
> 	Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED)
> 
> <orig>
>   o  Transport Protocol(s): If assignment of a port number is desired,
>      the transport protocol(s) for which the allocation is requested
>      MUST be provided.  This field is currently limited to one or more
>      of TCP, UDP, SCTP, and DCCP.
> <new>
>   o  Transport Protocol(s): The transport protocol(s) for which the
>      allocation is requested MUST be provided.  This field is currently
>      limited to one or more of TCP, UDP, SCTP, and DCCP. This field is
>      required even for services with no port number.

applied.

> <new - insert after Reference (REQUIRED)>
> 	Known Unauthorized Uses (OPTIONAL)
> 	Assignment Notes (OPTIONAL)
> 
> <new - insert after full description of Reference>
> 
> o Known Unauthorized Uses: A list of uses by applications or
> organizations who are not the assignee. This list may be augmented by
> IANA after assignment when unauthorized uses are reported.
> 
> o Assignment Notes: Indications of owner/name change, or any other
> assignment process issue. This list may be updated by IANA after
> assignment to help track changes to an assignment, e.g.,
> de-registration, owner/name changes, etc.

Also applied, for now, so we know what we are discussing.

Lars

PS: Diff to -04: