Re: [port-srv-reg] Fwd: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-07

[Olafur Gudmundsson <[e-mail]>]

On 22/10/2010 5:23 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>
>> FYI, from Alfred:
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>>> There are numerous significant and good updates in -07, but also
>>> a lot of details that still need more work.
>>> I'm in the process to collect comments and investigate details,
>>> but mostly busy with own doc's also to be updated before the cutoff.
>>> So sorry, will need several more days.
>>>
>>> BTW: draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify is being updated to
>>> accommodate the changes to tsvwg-iana-ports-07, and it will be
>>> out by the cutoff. Please recall that in Hiroshima it had been
>>> decided that *our* draft performs the updates to RFC 2872 and
>>> refers normatively to tsvwg-iana-ports for the registry, whereas
>>> tsvwg-iana-ports will refer to it normatively for the SRV updates
>>> / clarifications in turn, and both drafts shall be submitted for
>>> synchronized publication.
>>> This agreement has been confirmed to us after IETF 76 once more.
>>> There are changes in -07 that reflect this in part, but in particular
>>> the front matter and Abstract still say tsvwg-iana-ports Updates 2872.
>>>
>> My memory is a bit hazy - did we really agree to this?
>>
>>
> No. I've explained to Alfred the scope of Updates: RFC 2872 in your
> draft. Maybe I should do that again.
>
> So don't do this change.
>

Lars, yes this was the agreement.

Rather than get into an argument as who does what, lets first
compile a list of changes to 2782 from each document to weed out any 
redundancies and then figure out where they fit.

	Olafur