Re: [port-srv-reg] "xmp" service type and the unified IANA Service Name and Port Number Registry

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 26 August 2011 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2B421F8A64 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.831, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtZ+5t0QcQ-C for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4C621F8A57 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.91] (pool-71-105-81-169.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.105.81.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7Q6e7OY000112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E573FC7.3000702@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:40:07 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
References: <CA7C879E.F7AE%joe.hildebrand@webex.com> <4E5731CD.1020407@isi.edu> <A17F5240-F5FB-4D89-9AEB-CF46E13C4888@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <A17F5240-F5FB-4D89-9AEB-CF46E13C4888@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com>, port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] "xmp" service type and the unified IANA Service Name and Port Number Registry
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:39:11 -0000

On 8/25/2011 11:03 PM, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2011, at 22:40, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>> Sure, but you need to deploy something like Bonjour. I've been around that block a few times, and that's a substantial hurdle outside systems for which Bonjour is already installed (unless you want to sign Apple's licensing agreement and distribute Bonjour with your code, but that hurdle is unacceptable to many too).
>
> You don't need to use Apple's code to use DNS SRV records (but if you do want to use Apple's code, the "licensing agreement" is the Apache 2 license).

The former isn't the issue - it's known that the format isn't 
proprietary; the latter has been (and has changed over the years).

Joe