Re: [port-srv-reg] final updates - ports doc

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 10 May 2010 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13F3A6986 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOuduxEzo6nU for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5D43A6976 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o4AELjol009102 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:22:03 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 17:22:01 +0300
Received: from mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 17:22:00 +0300
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o4AELwFI006169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:21:59 +0300
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-19-988846366; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:21:45 +0300
In-Reply-To: <4BABC04D.206@isi.edu>
To: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
References: <201002190143.CAA21850@TR-Sys.de> <4B7F0FF4.5050904@isi.edu> <4B98AE6D.4040704@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <4B9AB98F.5080802@isi.edu> <4B9B6F07.7090105@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <4B9B9F8C.6080900@isi.edu> <4BABC04D.206@isi.edu>
Message-Id: <E8145091-E5F3-447B-89A1-C40709CBFD55@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 14:22:00.0067 (UTC) FILETIME=[2747AD30:01CAF04C]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] final updates - ports doc
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 14:22:33 -0000

Hi,

Gorry sent me a version with his changes, and I committed it to svn. I then made the changes I was signed up for, as follow:

On 2010-3-25, at 21:58, Joe Touch wrote:
> - point about multiple names that use the same port number
> 
> Two cases:
> 
> 	www/http = synonyms
> 	stun/turn = in-band negotiation
> 
> Lars:
> 
> Will update text as needed.

Done (see diff).

> - updates for new transport protocols
> 
> Lars:
> 
> Will add text for how new transports are handled.

Done (see diff).

> - how you get a port number vs ask for a port number
> 
> Lars:
> 
> Clarify how you either leave this open in the request or ask for a
> number. (how you state a preference)

I re-read the doc, and to me the text is clear. Anyone remember what this was about?

> - sec 7.3 / need to add IESG approval to IETF approval for system ports

Done (see diff).

Lars

PS: Diff has Gorry's and my changes.