Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"

FWIW, I'm a bit confused by the current terms. I think we all understand 
the goal - a tech contact and an owner.

However, both require contact info, so both are 'contacts'.

Further, the doc needs to be clear about aspects of a registration each 
contact is permitted to change. AFAICT (subject to IANA approval):

	tech POC - can change to anything EXCEPT tech POC and owner POC

	owner POC - can change anything

When tech POC and owner POC disagree, owner POC wins.

The key question is whether the tech POC can really change things at all 
without owner POC confirmation.

Joe

On 9/9/2010 7:42 AM, Mark Mcfadden wrote:
> I need to go through and change the rest of the document so that it is consistent.
> Let me do that later today.
>
> mark
>
> Mark McFadden
> mark.mcfadden@icann.org
> IANA Resource Specialist
> ________________________________________
> From: Stuart Cheshire [cheshire@apple.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:54 PM
> To: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> Cc: Mark Mcfadden
> Subject: Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"
>
> I see that Mark Mcfadden's checkin yesterday changed:
>
> @@ -874,8 +878,8 @@
>                <t>
>                Service Name (REQUIRED)<vspace />
>                Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED)<vspace />
> -            Registration Administrative Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
> -            Registration Technical Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
> +            Registrant (REQUIRED)<vspace />
> +            Contact (REQUIRED)<vspace />
>                Description (REQUIRED)<vspace />
>                Reference (REQUIRED)<vspace />
>                Port Number (OPTIONAL)<vspace />
>
> However, other places in the document still refer to "Administrative
> Contact" and "Technical Contact", which no longer make sense.
>
> Why was this changed? Do we need to reverse this change, or change
> the rest of the document to be consistent?
>
> Stuart Cheshire<cheshire@apple.com>
> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
> * www.stuartcheshire.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg