Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Sat, 04 September 2010 07:20 UTC
Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 36ED23A685E for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UNvm+G2NVLEL for
<port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E23A67F9 for
<port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay15.apple.com (relay15.apple.com [17.128.113.54]) by
mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EFBA632759 for
<port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7b3eae0000066cf-51-4c81f360664e
Received: from elliott.apple.com (elliott.apple.com [17.151.62.13]) by
relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 4E.9A.26319.063F18C4;
Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from [10.0.1.43] (c-24-6-164-127.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.164.127])
by elliott.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built
Sep 26 2008;
32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L8700J1KOF47560@elliott.apple.com> for
port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <AAC84BBA-C4F2-42C5-9B36-B1D5AA208F07@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:21:04 -0700
Message-id: <A0997387-6791-4ED1-B8DF-8FF667797228@apple.com>
References: <6EC7B8A7-C3B3-4E63-85A9-0DC31F4D45B4@nokia.com>
<58FA4E25-57CE-4D07-BFBA-A708F3616128@apple.com>
<AAC84BBA-C4F2-42C5-9B36-B1D5AA208F07@nokia.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port
registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:20:36 -0000
On 3 Sep 2010, at 1:15, Lars Eggert wrote: > Specifically for the issue you mention above, are we going to handle "www" and its aliases? If a web server doesn't register all aliases, it cannot be found by clients that e.g. look up "http". In that case, the ship has already sailed. Network printers with embedded web servers advertise "_http._tcp" Safari and other web browsers look for "_http._tcp" The primary service name is "_http._tcp", and "www" is merely an alias. Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc. * www.stuartcheshire.org
- [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Michelle Cotton
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Michelle Cotton
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Mark Mcfadden
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussion Stuart Cheshire
- [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Michelle Cotton
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] we need to make progress Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Lars Eggert
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Four final points for discussi… Michelle Cotton