Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 03 September 2010 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E13A692D for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZIK8qyvEwulN for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C43B3A6909 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.168.63] (bet.isi.edu [128.9.168.63]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83HMlvA003948; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C812EE7.50005@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:22:47 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
References: <6EC7B8A7-C3B3-4E63-85A9-0DC31F4D45B4@nokia.com> <E8979CB4-025B-4120-A7DE-12F81548E41E@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8979CB4-025B-4120-A7DE-12F81548E41E@apple.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Aliased service names
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:22:45 -0000

Stuart Cheshire wrote:
> Below is the list of every service I found where more than one name is listed for a port number.
> 
> In most cases I believe these are *not* aliases. They're two different services inadvertently colliding on the port number. The service names are *not* aliases of each other in these cases because they're not the same service.
> 
> In this whole list I only see four names that look like aliases to me:
> 
> "name" looks like an alias for "nameserver".
> 
> "www" and "www-http" are aliases for "http".
> 
> "auth" may be an alias for "ident".
> 
> So it looks like we have a total of THREE service names that have aliases.

Note that we also allowed aliases where the protocol in use can be
determined in-band (as per STUN/TURN), typically where one is legacy and
the other is the newer, backward-compatible version.

We probably want to discourage that in the future.

> --
> 
> List of aliased service names:

For the rest of these, IANA should determine which was actually assigned
and what are just squatters, and update the list accordingly.

Joe