Re: [POSH] [xmpp] Comments/questions on draft-miller-posh-00

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Wed, 31 July 2013 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: posh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: posh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBB11E81B8 for <posh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.218, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xso4Y6u8PdF6 for <posh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.IN.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896A111E81BE for <posh@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.18.133] (dhcp-1285.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.18.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r6VEDlqW013800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:52 +0200
Message-ID: <51F91B9B.1090700@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:47 +0200
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <CAPms+wRR_ZtLq94mRCDVXEW9WyZeDmYx+1hU+zCXV1fT0GSZ+g@mail.gmail.com> <51F401CE.9080803@stpeter.im> <51F8C1CE.1010701@goodadvice.pages.de> <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EE55C3F@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAKHUCzzBssWF8vLq9dcdXnd5LsMt5S7xoo6J8QvXUhmQd5jtyA@mail.gmail.com> <51F9136F.7020609@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <51F9136F.7020609@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "<posh@ietf.org>" <posh@ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Subject: Re: [POSH] [xmpp] Comments/questions on draft-miller-posh-00
X-BeenThere: posh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion about PKIX Over Secure HTTP <posh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/posh>, <mailto:posh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/posh>
List-Post: <mailto:posh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:posh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/posh>, <mailto:posh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:14:04 -0000

Am 31.07.2013 15:38, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
[...]
> I don't think we want POSH to be limited to SASL application protocols.

Nor do we want it to be limited to non-multi-tenant usecases.