[Pppext] Review of draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt

Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com> Thu, 13 November 2008 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <pppext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pppext-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pppext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CFD3A69FC; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:38:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7729D3A69FC for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrqSatNVZozm for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4773A69EF for <pppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:38:17 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,598,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="25600648"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2008 21:38:16 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mADLcGOW004541; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:16 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mADLcGHO006323; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:38:16 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com ([144.254.231.72]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:16 +0100
Received: from ams-townsley-8714.cisco.com ([10.55.233.229]) by xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:04 +0100
Message-ID: <491C9E43.3090406@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:11 +0100
From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pppext@ietf.org, draft-bberry-rfc4938bis@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2008 21:38:04.0327 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C16AB70:01C945D8]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=523; t=1226612296; x=1227476296; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=townsley@cisco.com; z=From:=20Mark=20Townsley=20<townsley@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Review=20of=20draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=haHPJ5XQOubrvae9t6Cf8l9UsOgWVzaxrDGx0Sv0Hj4=; b=AjwNvRlfTkGYIDjkq0VU7og7A1B2aC4z26l2HRno4y/9vFgG1Qi6UGQuxo QLKsyFmG2byhlVBKFdP3dIs5qEQ2miiPC5d4VEm26zTBi9kWqusZ+A5Mu2dx IIA+inJ5HJ;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=townsley@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Subject: [Pppext] Review of draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: pppext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pppext-bounces@ietf.org

pppext folks,

draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt has been submitted to the RFC Editor as 
an independent submission, thus not an IETF consensus document in any 
way. However, as with other pppoe documents, I would like pppext to take 
a look at it and provide any comments to the authors here.  Unless I 
hear otherwise from the authors or a revision is needed and not ready in 
time, the document will be on the Dec 4 IESG telechat, so please submit 
any comments by that time.

Thanks in advance all,

- Mark
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext