Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b

William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2011 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DA43A6834 for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFOfr8Y9rEnm for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86013A6765 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye19 with SMTP id 19so864587iye.31 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dkzQ7eq+ugZovWzwaC80sJOcY6H7/uYmzTVsUBRgBNc=; b=QXgSZ506bfNN+W2d+8m5NuGNajAzMzKfHobojLrjSvJ1v13Oum03yBK0040xpKiKmh U+Ui11clWL2ZNUbpL9hQfrFSWrfj+iWxo4wyZOVQl9DENf838kDqaRAAR0Cefm2qDtDY Ka+iyBr0QOIz6LyvqxrkWh56SweNp3KTt5n0w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O6L92LIM+P0CbFldn/x8qDlNF1euJgGeXFVY8TFOCHlNkJ5h4xqf5cXfEjMXPVqkS/ Ctw/hebDtiMkMKt4JZ+OHW1uyiexL37/SSJOBBDbMIpYZ7y9PmmrFxzKMBXyOWROQ7YV /iuXZncufEoduTMlX96rtjwu2gwZxFNpOq/jc=
Received: by 10.43.70.2 with SMTP id ye2mr447572icb.345.1301452281264; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Wastrel-3.local (c-68-40-194-239.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.194.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wo15sm3719835icb.4.2011.03.29.19.31.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D9295F6.5040401@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:31:18 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
References: <4D825FE1.2030801@gmail.com> <AANLkTinWMjYixP7o66AMPG7YtT9H65Qhq65Jva8OTg+9@mail.gmail.com> <4D921B39.2090706@gmail.com> <AANLkTin-jt2VTPTs-pFLLCbC1KWJ2_Awt-hJ2=RSLkOC@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-jt2VTPTs-pFLLCbC1KWJ2_Awt-hJ2=RSLkOC@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:29:44 -0000

On 3/29/11 6:06 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, William Allen Simpson
> <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>    Typically, IS-IS implementations base the identifier on an existing 6
>>>>    octet Media Access Control (MAC) identifier defined for one of its
>>>>    link-layer interfaces.  The 48-bit MAC is composed of a 24-bit
>>>
>>> "... is *usually* composed ..."
>>> Also add a reference to [RFC3452].
>>>
>> "FEC Building Block"?  Obsoleted by: 5052, 5445?
>
> :-)  Sorry, that's 5342. I got the right digits, just in a random
> order.... It has a definition of Individual Address Blocks.
>
That was already referenced.  I've noticed a serious error in it, but that
will be the topic of another message someday.