Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Sat, 10 September 2011 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D401521F8560 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOJGlF6mImrh for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D7221F84FA for <pppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so2278356wyg.31 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.132.205 with SMTP id c13mr1230854wbt.12.1315647187753; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-townsley-8712.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2sm9919324wbp.5.2011.09.10.02.33.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-11-185051547
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W6302577462E9225B73D52493000@phx.gbl>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:33:04 +0200
Message-Id: <455BD280-A0B0-4B2C-B7A8-2D45B0CB87FB@townsley.net>
References: <CAF4+nEF-G1zpRABffyT+fpx=Oc0__u1Yth6oK-1UWLTqEgCRVg@mail.gmail.com>, <201109100127.p8A1QxVI003799@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <BLU152-W6302577462E9225B73D52493000@phx.gbl>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "narten@us.ibm.com" <narten@us.ibm.com>, pppext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:31:12 -0000

On Sep 10, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

>  > If the purpose of such a meeting is to talk about rechartering, I see
> > no evidence that such time would be well spent.
> 
> [BA] +1
> 
> After such a long hiatus, I do not think it is wise to attempt to re-activate this WG. 
> 
> However, I might consider attending a "PPP Reunion Night" where we play music from the 90s, and reminisce about dialup modems. 

Now *that* sounds like a good use of time of which I would happily attend :-)

In addition to the 90s music, I think this would have to be our theme song...

http://www.freesound.org/people/Jlew/sounds/16475/

- Mark


> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pppext mailing list
> Pppext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext