IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 29 March 2011 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B973A6ACC for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.558, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJV51fv9b4yf for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949713A6825 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so626482wyb.31 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xKdk0MTyGzWxApifua+DlempRpuPiiFyqLpVmkEFlPk=; b=tLiEfPGrSHpr+3pebo5BMMIIC8/q05xQ6mKcmsy4YbQfZ7g/xhG4pTeOgIw4wCYYbF tAQ2LKTjf0C7pX0Of5FbxUpnnyS9wHOVw25dWl9MnTrTvt6X+lufrK8W11J6LQjcKX3x wl7qntw6wIAQQ/bQj4kyoyfvtvDRA7jI/UYL4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IJbEjbH+0CdnV/EA6AWAPr3sNEDMwURvrxqDeZr4PQs3b9GjTXom/udURKmJMtVJGh 4m7xBhVYqcgd/PDehkB+0/jdsbgaq4igpVJVdGm8xO6HYY0RBk8IZClorELd2NP5+ivT tuXGXtdUQ5x4R5QBvIt6woF4TU3zRYK5u9qvs=
Received: by 10.227.131.23 with SMTP id v23mr388473wbs.53.1301436410140; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.197.19 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D921B39.2090706@gmail.com>
References: <4D825FE1.2030801@gmail.com> <AANLkTinWMjYixP7o66AMPG7YtT9H65Qhq65Jva8OTg+9@mail.gmail.com> <4D921B39.2090706@gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:06:30 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-jt2VTPTs-pFLLCbC1KWJ2_Awt-hJ2=RSLkOC@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IETF PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:05:13 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:31 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> I mentioned yesterday at the ISIS Working Group meeting that this
>> draft was coming.
>>
> Tried listening, but missed the first 40 minutes as I'd thought it was
> UTC+1 -- it was UTC+2.

It wasn't that exciting. I just told people to keep an eye out for our
draft and explained in about four sentences what its goal was.

>>>   Typically, IS-IS implementations base the identifier on an existing 6
>>>   octet Media Access Control (MAC) identifier defined for one of its
>>>   link-layer interfaces.  The 48-bit MAC is composed of a 24-bit
>>
>> "... is *usually* composed ..."
>> Also add a reference to [RFC3452].
>>
> "FEC Building Block"?  Obsoleted by: 5052, 5445?

:-)  Sorry, that's 5342. I got the right digits, just in a random
order.... It has a definition of Individual Address Blocks.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street
 Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

>> These days you can get an 36 bit prefix, called an Individual Address
>> Block, which is cheaper than a 24 bit OUI pre-fix.
>>
> OK.
>
>
>>>   Some systems have only point-to-point links without any conveniently
>>>   available MAC, and do not have a configured identifier.  This status
>>>   might change dynamically, as hot swap interfaces are added or
>>>   removed.
>>
>> Suggest "only point-to-point links without any conveniently available
>> MAC" ->  "only point-to-point or other links that do not have an
>> associated MAC address"
>>
>> There could be some exotic link that isn't p2p but doesn't use MAC
>> addresses.
>>
> OK.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pppext mailing list
> Pppext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email