Re: [Pppext] I-D Action:draft-hu-pppext-ipv6cp-requirements-00.txt

James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Wed, 20 October 2010 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459943A6819 for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PC-devZl+Pp9 for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349873A680B for <pppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9KDwtKr020729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:58:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4CBEF59F.1070107@workingcode.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:58:55 -0400
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: huj@ctbri.com.cn
References: <201010200936.o9K9auaj016890@carlson.workingcode.com> <4CBEEF16.1030304@workingcode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CBEEF16.1030304@workingcode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Cc: pppext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pppext] I-D Action:draft-hu-pppext-ipv6cp-requirements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:57:31 -0000

James Carlson wrote:
> You will need to convince others here to support your effort.  I'm
> nominally the chair of the group, but I'm just one member.  I'll defer
> to the consensus.

To be precise, I should have said "just one participant."  It's not a
membership-based organization.  Sorry about the poor word choice; it
wasn't meant to be exclusionary.

In any event, the point remains the same.  I don't yet see the value in
what's being proposed, and it seems to be just a repetition of past
discarded proposals, but if there's a consensus among participants
otherwise, I'll go with that.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>