Re: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4790)

James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Thu, 01 September 2016 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE80712D933 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvSLBixLJ40q for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlson.workingcode.com [75.150.68.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B30B12D95B for <pppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 04:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.49.72.142] (fw-lex.abinitio.com [65.170.40.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id u81Bm414000864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:48:05 -0400
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, kory@ascend.com, gurdeep@microsoft.com, glennz@microsoft.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com
References: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org>
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
Message-ID: <f72c0742-1aa0-6c42-95d7-a5a6203cb023@workingcode.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:48:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160901082712.73279B80A94@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC--Metrics: carlson 1356; Body=9 Fuz1=9 Fuz2=9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pppext/UKr44YLzrnmSWp182eCup0A7wyU>
Cc: pppext@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Pppext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2637 (4790)
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 11:52:33 -0000

On 09/01/16 04:27, RFC Errata System wrote:
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Error Code               This field is set to 0 unless a "General
>                             Error" exists, in which case Result Code is
>                             set to 2 and this field is set to the value
>                             corresponding to the general error condition
>                             as specified in section 2.16.

The change makes sense to me, but this isn't a product of the PPPEXT
working group.  The RFC is Informational, and I believe that PPTP is
Microsoft's product.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>