[Pppext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2759 (6429)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 14 February 2021 07:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14AF3A15AA
for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:12:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AjYSx6bY3Yer for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A543A15A9
for <pppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30)
id DF345F40755; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:12:22 -0800 (PST)
To: gwz@acm.org, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: valopaint@yahoo.com, pppext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210214071222.DF345F40755@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pppext/Un8gsg0swk1Gq4v3FZBjLDxjUOs>
Subject: [Pppext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2759 (6429)
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>,
<mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>,
<mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 07:12:25 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2759, "Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions, Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6429 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Valentin Atanasov <valopaint@yahoo.com> Section: 9.1.2. Original Text ------------- Authenticator authentication failure <- Authenticator Challenge Peer Response/Challenge -> <- Success/Authenticator Response (Authenticator Response verification fails, peer disconnects) Corrected Text -------------- Authenticator authentication failure <- Authenticator Challenge Peer Response/Challenge -> <- Failure/Authenticator Response (Authenticator Response verification fails, peer disconnects) Notes ----- According to section 6. Failure Packet is identical in format to the standard CHAP Failure packet, but there are different codes for success and for failure so in case of failure the returned code must be 4 thus in section 9.1.2. the line "<- Success/Authenticator Response" the response logic should be Failure, not Succsess. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2759 (draft-ietf-pppext-mschap-v2-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions, Version 2 Publication Date : January 2000 Author(s) : G. Zorn Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pppext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2759 (642… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Pppext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2759 … James Carlson