Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2011 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68C33A680E for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.145
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5yC421GCwxc for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5753A6ADA for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so753253wwa.13 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nx/IFCMI1MwdGeSET1h2SUP0GfpbHgaFaf6qM8GHM9Q=; b=uDQAaf79L6NAI4UK8Myu1e+6k2lFKwHNGhJd61H8PbXOl5mcCmRieqhJKYTwpEg5A0 DrIhVAViYwapA7NZcTpX1wfHu3MsBeu09tOeb64fNK2ckbuaZMMHIXGkuPzKewn2EgfX +DRmmBglM7JW88z6exY0j2M/IlxpteVU5kHqg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QjX4ubAlA3sYSIgrT/y+twGwqeiDPbZcwQf+75lOYvcWoBtmStwGXJR65L4pWYUEwY olc68OvxDpRTZDLIYBKEuJZN2yXb1uKJ/14o0eyNZoPXJeDy1c5UZSRJXeCCQgxs/ND5 MpSbSn0lgI6ENI3Fk6WnHoNa6TfpphkzUIQS8=
Received: by 10.227.202.139 with SMTP id fe11mr729486wbb.169.1301464498130; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.197.19 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D9295F6.5040401@gmail.com>
References: <4D825FE1.2030801@gmail.com> <AANLkTinWMjYixP7o66AMPG7YtT9H65Qhq65Jva8OTg+9@mail.gmail.com> <4D921B39.2090706@gmail.com> <AANLkTin-jt2VTPTs-pFLLCbC1KWJ2_Awt-hJ2=RSLkOC@mail.gmail.com> <4D9295F6.5040401@gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:54:38 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-KMSb5gZmTDsU6Uj6swDuSFbW1p625bsTtu6=@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IETF PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pppext] draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-00b
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:53:35 -0000

Hi Bill,

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:31 AM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/11 6:06 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, William Allen Simpson
>> <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Typically, IS-IS implementations base the identifier on an existing 6
>>>>>   octet Media Access Control (MAC) identifier defined for one of its
>>>>>   link-layer interfaces.  The 48-bit MAC is composed of a 24-bit
>>>>
>>>> "... is *usually* composed ..."
>>>> Also add a reference to [RFC3452].
>>>>
>>> "FEC Building Block"?  Obsoleted by: 5052, 5445?
>>
>> :-)  Sorry, that's 5342. I got the right digits, just in a random
>> order.... It has a definition of Individual Address Blocks.
>>
> That was already referenced.  I've noticed a serious error in it, but that
> will be the topic of another message someday.

Well, it isn't a big deal whether there is a reference to RFC 5342
here but I also don't see it as a problem for something to be
referenced at more than one place in a draft. Up to you.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street
 Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com