IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pppext] [Fwd: Re: [rbridge] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text]

James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Mon, 07 February 2011 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279CD3A6E14 for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VM4ac+AcgOvE for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE053A6E02 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p17GFx4A023225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:16:00 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D501ABD.1050103@workingcode.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:15:57 -0500
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000108090408020708060200"
X-DCC-SIHOPE-DCC-3-Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Subject: [Pppext] [Fwd: Re: [rbridge] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text]
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:15:57 -0000

This message was somehow lost in the ether.  I've contacted ietf-action
to see if they can dig up any information.  In any event, sorry, Anoop,
for the inadvertent delay.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:34 PM, James Carlson
<carlsonj@workingcode.com> wrote:

> At a minimum, I want to hear from IS-IS and TRILL experts before I go
> ahead with proposing any new random-number-based System ID mechanism.
> If they sign on, then I'll go ahead with it.
>
> But my off-the-cuff guess is that they'll have objections, and more
> objections probably aren't helpful in getting to consensus.

Coming from the TRILL part of the world, I don't think this is a problem
that needs to be addressed in this draft.  Generating a unique System ID
for IS-IS is an IS-IS problem, and as such should be addressed in the IS-IS
working group.

Anoop
--- End Message ---

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email