Re: [Pppext] Errata classification
James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 10:53 UTC
Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A17621F85A4 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XR0BnexBkIeX for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC7B21F859F for <pppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q49Ar9B7025555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 May 2012 06:53:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FAA4C95.70500@workingcode.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:09 -0400
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <4FA9805F.6070602@innovationslab.net> <CAF4+nEFHTy3p29txQPK70U5+Qjts7kBnEwwC3js0tGzj2+i1-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEFHTy3p29txQPK70U5+Qjts7kBnEwwC3js0tGzj2+i1-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC--Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Cc: IETF PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Errata classification
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:53:19 -0000
Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi, > > The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their opinion? > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1924 At Sun, I worked on an implementation of RFC 2759, and verified the resulting compatibility with Microsoft RAS. The erratum is correct. The password is indeed hashed using UTF-16-LE encoding. (I suspect, but cannot prove, that it was originally defined on NT using UCS-2-LE rather than UTF-16-LE. But the distinction almost certainly doesn't matter.) -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
- [Pppext] Errata classification Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Pppext] Errata classification James Carlson
- Re: [Pppext] Errata classification Donald Eastlake