IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-04.txt

James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Mon, 09 May 2011 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAB3E06B9 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQPfkCNfx3P2 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00303E06A6 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p49I5rDQ025561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 May 2011 14:05:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4DC82D01.10004@workingcode.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:05:53 -0400
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
References: <20110509160227.21325.4443.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4DC81609.8040200@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DC81609.8040200@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Cc: pppext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 18:17:40 -0000

William Allen Simpson wrote:
> It seems to be a small improvement on the security details.

Thanks.

>  What the
> status of the related TRILL drafts?  Are we behind?

I'm not sure I know what you mean, but the rest of them are awaiting
publication now:

http://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C74

So, yes, this draft is behind the other TRILL documents, but if we get
to the end of the last call successfully this time, it won't be by much.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email