Re: [Pppext] Charter update
James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Thu, 21 May 2009 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <carlsonj@carlson.workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 57E283A6CB8 for <pppext@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 05:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w+ziIUTJA3oM for
<pppext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 05:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com
(carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E63A68E0 for <pppext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 05:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4LCi922005346;
Thu, 21 May 2009 08:44:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by carlson.workingcode.com
(8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n4LCi8g6005343;
Thu, 21 May 2009 08:44:08 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <18965.19608.816239.333462@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:44:08 -0400
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: William Allen Simpson's message of 19 May 2009 17:53:22
References: <4A11560C.9000806@piuha.net> <4A132A52.1040008@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.1
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-DCC-URT-Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Cc: pppext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Charter update
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>,
<mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>,
<mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:51:16 -0000
[Sorry if this message results in duplicates; mailman seems to dislike the Sun version of me for some reason.] William Allen Simpson writes: > Seems OK, other than "not expected to create new specifications". I think Jari Arkko wants the charter to match up better with reality. > How about changing to: "... new specifications, other than replacing or > updating authentication, confidentiality, and improved key management > specifications. If a need for other additional work arises, ...." Won't most of that work go on in the EAP wg? Would we really want to extend CHAP? > Another thing that group probably ought to discuss is formally retiring > some of the ancient Proposed work as Historic. True. > Admittedly, we gave up on advancing things like IPCP, as IPv4 was supposedly > ready to be replaced (for the past 15 years). Ha! :-/ If someone wanted to put the work into advancing 1332 or one of the other old documents, I'd certainly be supportive. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
- [Pppext] Charter update Jari Arkko
- Re: [Pppext] Charter update William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Pppext] Charter update James Carlson
- Re: [Pppext] Charter update Jari Arkko