Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update
zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Mon, 11 June 2012 01:33 UTC
Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356B621F84D6 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.023
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.023 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fp9lqVFKj4dX for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA07121F84D5 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4731EE40A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:33:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AACE409; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:33:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.2.43.220]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2012061109332843-1636 ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:33:28 +0800
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:33:27 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: Picconi Fabio <Fabio.Picconi@technicolor.com>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
References: <C2917A21-A82F-412E-8B34-9B4053504929@cisco.com>, <320C4182454E96478DC039F2C481987204EFAD04EF@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.85[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201206110933269837847@chinamobile.com>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-06-11 09:33:28, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-06-11 09:33:29, Serialize complete at 2012-06-11 09:33:29
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart304285203034_=----"
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-18962.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--28.238-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--28.238-7.0-31-10;No--28.238-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Subject: Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:33:34 -0000
Thanks Fabio. That will be good in making the protocol solid. Looking forward to your result. BR Yunfei zhangyunfei From: Picconi Fabio Date: 2012-06-07 21:02 To: ppsp Subject: Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update I will do some simulations to determine which chunk addressing mechanism performs best in the average case. Fabio > -----Original Message----- > From: ppsp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > stefano previdi > Sent: lundi 4 juin 2012 11:39 > To: ppsp; zhangyunfei Zhang > Subject: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update > > All, > > here are some notes i preparation of the next PPSP meeting we're going > to have in Vancouver (http://www.ietf.org/meeting/84/index.html) > > 1. Peer Protocol - chunk addressing mechanism > We currently have two proposals that I'd try to name as: > . Bin Notation > . Ranges > Both proposals have been discussed in the mailing list and it > looks to me we're NOT achieving agreement/consensus on any of > them also due to lack of participation of the WG into the > discussion (other than the authors of each proposal). > > Therefore, as of today, we can reasonably explore the > following options: > Option-1: We propose both solutions in the peer protocol > specification and we define them both MANDATORY so > to cope with interoperability issues. > Option-2: we select one option through a WG vote (this is my > least preferred option). > > Since I'd really prefer to avoid Option-2, I can only consider > the "dual" specification. WG opinion on this is requested. > > Again, it would be very beneficial to the WG if current > implementors of streaming protocols would/could speak-up and > give their opinion (see point 4 below). > > 2. Peer Protocol - Security Section > The IESG will not accept any protocol specification without a > consistent security section (IOW: way more than what we > currently have) although there are some arguments on whether > we need the security mechanisms in the base spec. > > Arno and Zong Ning proposed some text and we need to agree/amend > it asap so to update the draft. I'd like to close this one and > have a new version of the draft for next meeting. > > 3. Tracker Protocol > After IETF83 we agreed to split into two distinct drafts: base > specification and optional extensions. > > Authors, it would be good to have a first submission before next > meeting. > > 4. Survey draft. > We need to refresh/re-submit and the chairs proposed the > authors/editors to include a section on deployment experiences > and more precisely on chunk addressing and security mechanisms. > Hopefully this will also feed ongoing discussions. > > 5. Meeting during IETF84. > We have requested a slot for Vancouver meeting. Anyone > interested, please request an agenda slot asap to Yunfei or > myself. > > Let us know if anything is missing. > > Thanks. > > Stefano & Yunfei > _______________________________________________ > ppsp mailing list > ppsp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp _______________________________________________ ppsp mailing list ppsp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp
- [ppsp] PPSP WG Update stefano previdi
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update Arno Bakker
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update Rui Cruz
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update Picconi Fabio
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update Picconi Fabio
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update zhangyunfei