Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion
"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916DE1A8983 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id layUU3UWynyG for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C501A8925 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKW91895; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:25:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:25:05 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.21]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:25:01 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: "hishigh@sina.com" <hishigh@sina.com>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion
Thread-Index: AQHP73FSqXOTEyC/CUWPvHE4fcVY4Jw/B5kg
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:25:00 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB8624B9E8@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <20141024100003.7F276405C1@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20141024100003.7F276405C1@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.144]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB8624B9E8nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppsp/F6DaAT1B6qT2fFhRywkBVFGrwls
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:25:10 -0000
Hi Yunfei,
Please see inline.
BR,
Rachel
From: ppsp [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of yunfei
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 6:00 PM
To: ppsp
Subject: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion
Hi all,
The following is the quick notes from the online discussion.
Attendees: Yunfei, Rachel, Mi, Jianwei,Dave,K?
Base tracker protocol:
1. Yunfei: See comments from Roni (Thanks Roni) and also sent comments to the mailing list. Rachel reeplied in the mailing list.
2. Dave: Efficiency comparison bw text based and binary protocol.
Rachel and Yunfei recalled the history of this problem and the current WG consensus is to let the encoding issue out of scope of the current protocol development and focus on syntax and sementics.
3. Yunfei calls for more volunteered experts to review the base tracker protocol so that the WG can stablize and finalize the draft.
Extended tracker protocol:
1. Yunfei: The chunk addressing issue. The draft states that one swarm support one kind of chunk addressing. So who decides the chunk addressing scheme? The first peer or the content provider? It should be explict.
Rachel: Content provider.
Yunfei: Suggest to ask for Arno to clarify if it is easy to convert from one kind of chunk addressing scheme to another( has the impression that it is easy in the peer protocol draft). If it were the case, it will provide the content owner a good feather to easily attract more peers who will otherwise supports only one kind of chunk addressing scheme in the software.
[Rachel]: I have discussed with Arno before. See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/current/msg01753.html. I don't think converting from one kind to another should be considered.
BR
Yunfei
- [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion yunfei
- Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion Prof. Rui Santos Cruz Eng.