IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion

"Prof. Rui Santos Cruz Eng." <rui.cruz@ieee.org> Fri, 24 October 2014 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rui.cruz@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78DB1A8925 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dA194bAP_GQC for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72081A875F for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so759602wgh.0 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=k4yISgNLh8+/gPcD229qhmsTeVTkND8/goPWF5Y2VRc=; b=TPajjgue6zwAFByeIPmSzBpl2oItA6rPdv4uFEo6jFGNgANWF3axvjnk7N6ovUe2J9 FJPltOQWqX0zWVX9gPelq6YM49CqdnbX/wiXHZHZzKmMUiJJ9GHj6KzBhKr+4Mlss9JZ 8KTBAe5p3w4zXzj5gVicFZz8bela/jHNJchZxIef6/X4g8JEkQ+su8dTZzBHlx3Wv4fu dbltvbqgmAo0nft1s4Oi4/pdsYUu8BFgaby1CvdTqv97rUkUgCVUIKVMuWjbjMQh9KwX zrNPV3zDhS6JrAPSBgi7RNZY348WOuUmKvV5vYyuAI9HBSUJ4mbuCM84rpxBB8f/ruB1 SeYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmleUfxHiHpLiseezefahD9Bmehrd1BHCfuQ5PBJ0ouMw56cydlerIHLXhDZ4U/mRaML1dl
X-Received: by 10.180.219.106 with SMTP id pn10mr3115467wic.63.1414146499308; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from airia.home (a95-93-148-247.cpe.netcabo.pt. [95.93.148.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm1507099wif.20.2014.10.24.03.28.17 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_438695EB-89DC-42A3-8CB5-786569C0FD4E"
From: "Prof. Rui Santos Cruz Eng." <rui.cruz@ieee.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20141024100003.7F276405C1@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:28:17 +0100
Message-Id: <1CF50270-EDF0-432B-A4F0-07EAC272D242@ieee.org>
References: <20141024100003.7F276405C1@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
To: hishigh@sina.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppsp/JaGLEUM2m7RH5yuLjYhiaWCSCMM
Cc: ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Notes from the online discussion
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:29:13 -0000

Dear All,

I just missed the call because my calendar played a trick on me. 
I’m still connected in webex and considered strange that nobody was on the call …

Then I read this email ….

I am very, very sorry… 


----
Cumprimentos / Regards,
Rui Cruz



> On 24 Oct 2014, at 11:00, yunfei <hishigh@sina.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>     The following is the quick notes from the online discussion.
> 
>  
> Attendees: Yunfei, Rachel, Mi, Jianwei,Dave,K?
> 
> Base tracker protocol:
> 
> 1. Yunfei: See comments from Roni (Thanks Roni) and also sent comments to the mailing list. Rachel reeplied in the mailing list.
> 
> 2. Dave: Efficiency comparison bw text based and binary protocol.
> 
>     Rachel and Yunfei recalled the history of this problem and the current WG consensus is to let the encoding issue out of scope of the current protocol development and focus on syntax and sementics.
> 
> 3. Yunfei calls for more volunteered experts to review the base tracker protocol so that the WG can stablize and finalize the draft.
> 
>  
> Extended tracker protocol:
> 
> 1. Yunfei: The chunk addressing issue. The draft states that one swarm support one kind of chunk addressing. So who decides the chunk addressing scheme? The first peer or the content provider? It should be explict.
> 
>     Rachel: Content provider. 
> 
>    Yunfei: Suggest to ask for Arno to clarify if it is easy to convert from one kind of chunk addressing scheme to another( has the impression that it is easy in the peer protocol draft). If it were the case, it will provide the content owner a good feather to easily attract more peers who will otherwise supports only one kind of chunk addressing scheme in the software. 
> 
>  
> BR
> 
> Yunfei
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ppsp mailing list
> ppsp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email