[ppsp] #35: PPSP.REQ-8: More support needed for QoS?
"ppsp issue tracker" <trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 20 June 2012 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E17321F8703 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-SdkBGm2qj9 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [77.72.230.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6906921F86C1 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55047 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1ShFV7-0001dm-MP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:38:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: ppsp issue tracker <trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol@tools.ietf.org, arno@cs.vu.nl
X-Trac-Project: ppsp
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:38:53 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/ppsp/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ppsp/trac/ticket/35
Message-ID: <052.d6367963d989aca31b17742200467658@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 35
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol@tools.ietf.org, arno@cs.vu.nl, ppsp@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20120620073858.6906921F86C1@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:38:58 -0700
Resent-From: trac+ppsp@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:58:11 -0700
Cc: ppsp@ietf.org
Subject: [ppsp] #35: PPSP.REQ-8: More support needed for QoS?
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:38:59 -0000
#35: PPSP.REQ-8: More support needed for QoS?
The current protocol has been designed for short-time-till-playback,
unless limited by security considerations (cf. Issue #26 security of
handshakes). Otherwise it operates in a best effort mode.
But perhaps more is needed, as indicated in the description. Also
relevant is issue 12 (=Support for UNHINT), as that helps in making
requesting chunks from multiple peers at the same time efficient,
as you can cancel the duplicates when you receive an answer.
You may need double requests when some peers are slow and strong QoS
is needed.
--
---------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: arno@… | Owner: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: peer-protocol | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
---------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ppsp/trac/ticket/35>
ppsp <http://tools.ietf.org/ppsp/>
- [ppsp] #35: PPSP.REQ-8: More support needed for Q… ppsp issue tracker