Re: [ppsp] PPSP WG Update

[Rui Cruz <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

The Tracker Protocol is  being split to a base specification draft and to extensions.
We hope to have the base specification submitted in a couple of weeks. 


Regards,

Rui Cruz
[e-mail]

IST/INESC-ID/INOV - Lisbon, Portugal
__________________________________________
ppsp mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp

On 04/06/2012, at 10:39, stefano previdi wrote:

> All,
> 
> here are some notes i preparation of the next PPSP meeting we're 
> going to have in Vancouver (http://www.ietf.org/meeting/84/index.html)
> 
> 1. Peer Protocol - chunk addressing mechanism
>   We currently have two proposals that I'd try to name as:
> . Bin Notation
> . Ranges
>   Both proposals have been discussed in the mailing list and it 
>   looks to me we're NOT achieving agreement/consensus on any of 
>   them also due to lack of participation of the WG into the 
>   discussion (other than the authors of each proposal).
> 
>   Therefore, as of today, we can reasonably explore the 
>   following options:
>   Option-1: We propose both solutions in the peer protocol 
>             specification and we define them both MANDATORY so 
>             to cope with interoperability issues.
>   Option-2: we select one option through a WG vote (this is my 
>             least preferred option).
> 
>   Since I'd really prefer to avoid Option-2, I can only consider 
>   the "dual" specification. WG opinion on this is requested.
> 
>   Again, it would be very beneficial to the WG if current 
>   implementors of streaming protocols would/could speak-up and 
>   give their opinion (see point 4 below).
> 
> 2. Peer Protocol - Security Section
>   The IESG will not accept any protocol specification without a 
>   consistent security section (IOW: way more than what we 
>   currently have) although there are some arguments on whether 
>   we need the security mechanisms in the base spec.
> 
>   Arno and Zong Ning proposed some text and we need to agree/amend 
>   it asap so to update the draft. I'd like to close this one and 
>   have a new version of the draft for next meeting.
> 
> 3. Tracker Protocol
>   After IETF83 we agreed to split into two distinct drafts: base 
>   specification and optional extensions.
> 
>   Authors, it would be good to have a first submission before next 
>   meeting.
> 
> 4. Survey draft.
>   We need to refresh/re-submit and the chairs proposed the 
>   authors/editors to include a section on deployment experiences 
>   and more precisely on chunk addressing and security mechanisms. 
>   Hopefully this will also feed ongoing discussions.
> 
> 5. Meeting during IETF84.
>   We have requested a slot for Vancouver meeting. Anyone 
>   interested, please request an agenda slot asap to Yunfei or 
>   myself.
> 
> Let us know if anything is missing.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Stefano & Yunfei
> _______________________________________________
> ppsp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp