Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):transport mechanism
ZongNing <zongning@huawei.com> Fri, 30 March 2012 09:52 UTC
Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1076721F8718 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_63=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8eLpn+uk2eu for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0D21F86E2 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AEU96457; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:50:32 -0700
Received: from SZXEML416-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.155) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:49:40 -0700
Received: from SZXEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.151]) by szxeml416-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.155]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:50:25 +0800
From: ZongNing <zongning@huawei.com>
To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):transport mechanism
Thread-Index: AQHNDlLZRNbftRumhUes4L3O5m7lA5aClEKw
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:50:24 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677916CE724C@szxeml504-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <2012033016511639412036@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <2012033016511639412036@chinamobile.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677916CE724Cszxeml504mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):transport mechanism
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:52:24 -0000
Hi, Yunfei, I think it is related if RTCWeb includes the scenario of one browser streaming video to others by using P2P way. Also start discussing P2P use case in RTCWeb (or discussing web-brower usage in PPSP) might be interesting. -Ning ________________________________ From: ppsp-bounces@ietf.org [ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of zhangyunfei [zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 4:53 PM To: ppsp Subject: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):transport mechanism Hi all, To continue the re-charter discussion in PPSP WG meeting, I would like to discuss more on the transport mechanism issue. I happen to know in RTCWeb, the transport protocol between two peer browsers seems to been decided: For media part, srtp/rtp over UDP(I am not quite sure of if it is accurate). For data transmit, Datagrams over SCTP over DTLS over UDP. My question is: If this related to PPSP transport mechanism? Or totally two different things?Any different requirements? Just to provide such info to incur discussion. BR Yunfei ________________________________ zhangyunfei
- [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):transpo… zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):tra… ZongNing
- Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):tra… zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):tra… Y. Richard Yang
- Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):tra… Arno Bakker
- Re: [ppsp] re-charter issue discussion(cont'):tra… Wesley Eddy