IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ppsp] ***SPAM*** 7.078 (5) Re: 答复: Call for Comments on Usage of PPSP

"Mi Zhang" <13120174@bjtu.edu.cn> Tue, 09 December 2014 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <13120174@bjtu.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A740C1A03A5 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:32:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 7.078
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Net11XzwMJjp for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bjtu.edu.cn (mail.bjtu.edu.cn [218.249.29.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDFB1A014A for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ajax-webmail-Jdweb4 (Coremail) ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:32:36 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:32:36 +0800
From: Mi Zhang <13120174@bjtu.edu.cn>
To: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <75947eda.57d8.14a2ce422f4.Coremail.13120174@bjtu.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779662168C2@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <7bd5a699.83e.14a0365e81c.Coremail.13120174@bjtu.edu.cn> <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779662168C2@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_82610_924730396.1418092356338"
X-Originating-IP: [211.71.67.158]
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version XT2.1.11 dev build 20140513(27092.6055.6128) Copyright (c) 2002-2014 www.mailtech.cn bjtu-test
X-SendMailWithSms: false
X-CM-TRANSID: eJ5wygB32x1EX4ZUBPoIAA--.7826W
X-CM-SenderInfo: artrjiarxuquxmwxhvlgxou0/1tbiAgMNB1Ryp0aVvQABsl
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VWUJw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppsp/Rmw5NlegF3-aiIKc4CzrV5294SI
Subject: [ppsp] ***SPAM*** 7.078 (5) Re: 答复: Call for Comments on Usage of PPSP
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 02:32:17 -0000

Hi,Ning,




    You are right. 


    The suggestion for optimal (default) parameters of PPSP should be explained through data analysis. And this is exactly what we are doing. 






Thanks.


BR 

Mi Zhang
-----原始邮件-----
发件人: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
发送时间: 2014年12月8日 星期一
收件人: "Mi Zhang" <13120174@bjtu.edu.cn>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
抄送:
主题: 答复: [ppsp] Call for Comments on Usage of PPSP



Hi, Mi,

 

I noticed that in Section 4, you listed the parameters adopted by Tracker Protocol & Peer Protocol. It’s ideal that you could further give some benchmarking data as the results of your PPSP system. For example, you could run a P2P live streaming test and report the results under your settings.

 

Thanks.

 

-Ning

 

发件人: ppsp [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Mi Zhang
发送时间: 2014年12月1日 9:10
收件人: ppsp
主题: [ppsp] Call for Comments on Usage of PPSP

 

Deal all:

    We have updated a new version of PPSP Usage. Your review and further comments are well appreciated.

    More importantly, we would like to know whether the current overall framework is reasonable and meets the WG item. Please let us know if something is missing.

    Thanks.

 

BR

Mi Zhang

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email