IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ppsp] Request: draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol as WG item

Arno Bakker <arno@cs.vu.nl> Tue, 18 December 2012 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <a.bakker@vu.nl>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D23E21F8880 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.990, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Peb4vEUQGjUW for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailin.vu.nl (mailin.vu.nl [130.37.164.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EB821F892E for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PEXHB012B.vu.local (130.37.236.67) by mailin.vu.nl (130.37.164.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:34:34 +0100
Received: from [109.37.90.204] (130.37.238.20) by mails.vu.nl (130.37.236.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:34:23 +0100
Message-ID: <50D01CB3.6070206@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:35:15 +0100
From: Arno Bakker <arno@cs.vu.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rui Cruz <rui.cruz@ieee.org>
References: <1388AC0A-2E2E-4EE5-8868-688E7BE6E252@cisco.com> <EC14A918-B208-411A-902C-994297E0035C@cisco.com> <50A21BF4.9010102@cs.vu.nl> <52529918-0790-47C2-84D0-A1D11FE14129@ieee.org> <50A344CA.6060307@cs.vu.nl> <35D4DB2A-7468-490C-8147-FA9E5FF69B50@ieee.org> <50ACCF90.6080308@cs.vu.nl> <67029FDA-544B-4D28-AC12-A36EDC73957B@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <67029FDA-544B-4D28-AC12-A36EDC73957B@ieee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [130.37.238.20]
Cc: ppsp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Request: draft-cruz-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol as WG item
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: arno@cs.vu.nl
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:34:34 -0000

Hi Rui et al

On 07/12/2012 14:39, Rui Cruz wrote:
>
>  From that, it is not logic to send an "action" request just to provide
> "status/statistic" information.
>

Then I guess we have different opinions on this. But my proposal was 
just a simplification not a missing feature, so let's leave it.


> But if the properties of peers are related with activity or
> capabilities, then I agree with you that a selection based on those
> properties would only be considered "safe" if the requesting peers are
> trusted and well known.
>
> We can add these concerns to the draft document.

Good. Please do.

Happy holidays!
      Arno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email