Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83
Arno Bakker <arno@cs.vu.nl> Wed, 18 April 2012 07:57 UTC
Return-Path: <a.bakker@vu.nl>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAE621F855A for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.957, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8q9eT3Y9XTT for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailin.vu.nl (mailin.vu.nl [130.37.164.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28FC21F8539 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PEXHB012B.vu.local (130.37.236.67) by mailin.vu.nl (130.37.164.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:57:32 +0200
Received: from [130.161.211.249] (130.37.238.20) by mails.vu.nl (130.37.236.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:57:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4F8E740D.4070107@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:58:05 +0200
From: Arno Bakker <arno@cs.vu.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
References: <2012041809482198565512@chinamobile.com>, <4F8E5B8A.1040202@cs.vu.nl> <2012041814533970608944@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <2012041814533970608944@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [130.37.238.20]
Cc: ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: arno@cs.vu.nl
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:57:32 -0000
On 18/04/2012 08:53, zhangyunfei wrote:
> I encourage to have more fruitful discussions on this base selection. If
> there is no consensus after a certain of time(say, several weeks), we
> may have to resort to the means, e.g., polling, which is the least we'd
> like to use.
Hi
what does this mean for the issues raised months ago on which there has
been no discussion here?
* "Proposal to solve Issue #26: Evaluate the handshake procedure if it
needs strengthening against "state-building attacks" Jan 25th
* "Proposal to resolve Issue 17+20: Peer Address Exchange" Feb 14th
* "New issues derived from PPSP requirements" Feb 14th
* "SEC.REQ-4 Analysis" Feb 15th
Can we set a deadline for May 9th (3 weeks) to resolve these before they
go to polling? What does the polling procedure look like?
Regards,
Arno
- [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 Arno Bakker
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 zhangyunfei
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 Arno Bakker
- Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83 Arno Bakker
- [ppsp] 回复: Re: PPSP notes for IETF 83 zhangyunfei