[ppsp] 回复: Re: PPSP notes for IETF 83

zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Fri, 20 April 2012 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCD621F8795 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -90.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-90.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.797, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgJUWUQFoFAT for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC2321F874F for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599DE4CA; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:20:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B18AE4C6; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:20:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.1.5.3]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2012042023201795-22152 ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:20:17 +0800
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:20:05 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: "arno@cs.vu.nl" <arno@cs.vu.nl>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <2012041809482198565512@chinamobile.com>, <4F8E5B8A.1040202@cs.vu.nl> <2012041815225300068577@chinamobile.com>, <4F8E6EEC.4020908@cs.vu.nl>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.85[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2012042023200503896542@chinamobile.com>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-04-20 23:20:18, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-04-20 23:20:20, Serialize complete at 2012-04-20 23:20:20
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart543560866726_=----"
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-18850.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--22.211-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--22.211-7.0-31-10;No--22.211-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Cc: ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Subject: [ppsp] 回复: Re: PPSP notes for IETF 83
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:20:24 -0000

Hi Martin,
    Would you please confirm the notes in the following part? Thanks.

BR
yunfei




zhangyunfei

发件人: Arno Bakker
发送时间: 2012-04-18 15:36
收件人: zhangyunfei
抄送: ppsp
主题: Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83
On 18/04/2012 09:22, zhangyunfei wrote:
> Hi Arno,
> I read the notes again and it should be "?"missing in the end of the 
> sentence, i.e., Is it really good to wait 200ms for the data? Thanks.
> 

Hi

then I don't understand the remark :-( I recall we were talking about
adding an extra roundtrip to the handshake procedure between peer A and
B to avoid remembering state at B initially. I don't like that because
it adds to the time-till-playback and don't think it is necessary.
AFAIK, Martin asked whether the extra roundtrip was actually that bad.

Minor point though.

CU,
    Arno