[ppsp] Tracker Protocol Encoding

Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Mon, 24 November 2014 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AEF1A1C06 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKjw8z5lQ-8t for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1BD1A1DFA for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPD53834; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:17:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:17:29 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:17:24 +0800
From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: "ppsp@ietf.org" <ppsp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Tracker Protocol Encoding
Thread-Index: AdAHx3UYHyqwn9RWSOq1rS7NedAOwA==
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:17:24 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779661F2C70@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779661F2C70nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppsp/sOE8PFYmWjWc85QOtso5lRyGRqU
Subject: [ppsp] Tracker Protocol Encoding
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:17:37 -0000

Hi, folks,

During the call for consensus on Tracker Protocol encoding, we have seen that most of the people including the co-authors of Tracker Protocol I-D prefer to adopt text based encoding.
As co-chairs, Yunfei and I have concluded that Tracker Protocol should have text based encoding as mandatory, and other encoding methods as optional.

We therefore request the co-authors of Tracker Protocol I-D to revise the draft to reflect this conclusion, and send out the new revision for review, by *early of December*.


Yunfei & Ning, as co-chairs.