Re: [ppsp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-02.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9D611E8088 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.305, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JPI03CqXFLR for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (omr5.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B4821F85D8 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr10 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6BGfaUW006173 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:41:36 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr10 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [63.226.32.150] ([63.226.32.150:13207] helo=[172.27.250.202]) by cm-omr10 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 48/FD-04850-FBCADFF4; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:41:36 -0400
Message-ID: <4FFDACBF.3080908@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:41:35 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: arno@cs.vu.nl
References: <20120620060416.20536.93957.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2012062015092544515442@chinamobile.com> <4FFD2967.7080402@cs.vu.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4FFD2967.7080402@cs.vu.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ppsp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:41:07 -0000

On 7/11/2012 3:21 AM, Arno Bakker wrote:
> Good that you mention transports, AFAIK that still needs to be
> discussed. Candidates are:
> 
> * UDP with congestion control (e.g. LEDBAT)


I'm wondering if LEDBAT is the right choice, given that its
design is to let itself get drowned out.  LEDBAT made sense
for BitTorrent streams running in the background, but I don't
think it makes as much sense for live-streaming.

It seems that TFRC might be more appropriate to me.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems