IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83

zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Wed, 18 April 2012 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE13B21F85A7 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.044, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSAWF6tHdohc for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C221F85A3 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB305ECD4; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:53:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF714ECCC; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:53:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.2.43.220]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2012041814534318-12295 ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:53:43 +0800
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:53:39 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: "arno@cs.vu.nl" <arno@cs.vu.nl>, ppsp <ppsp@ietf.org>
References: <2012041809482198565512@chinamobile.com>, <4F8E5B8A.1040202@cs.vu.nl>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.85[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2012041814533970608944@chinamobile.com>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-04-18 14:53:43, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-04-18 14:53:44, Serialize complete at 2012-04-18 14:53:44
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart081813203517_=----"
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-18846.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--25.647-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--25.647-7.0-31-10;No--25.647-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Subject: Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:53:51 -0000

Hi Arno,
    Thanks for the correction. I'll fix the error.
     My understanding about the current discussion is that because chunk addressing is the basic of everything in peer protocol, it becomes focus of the discussion. Only when we  get consensus on this can we go further. The mailing list discussion didn't get the conclusion to adopt which chunk addressing scheme, e.g., range based or MHT based as the base. This affects other problems discussion. 
     I encourage to have more fruitful discussions on this base selection. If there is no consensus after a certain of time(say, several weeks), we may have to resort to the means, e.g., polling, which is the least we'd like to use.

BR
Yunfei




zhangyunfei

From: Arno Bakker
Date: 2012-04-18 14:13
To: ppsp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ppsp] PPSP notes for IETF 83
On 18/04/2012 03:48, zhangyunfei wrote:
> Hi all,
> The minutes for IETF83 has been uploaded and you can find the document
> in http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-ppsp.docx.
> Please review it and let Stefano and me know if you have any comments on
> that. Thanks Christian for taking the notes.
> Stefano and I are creating tickets based on the notes, which need to be
> decided in the mailing list.I'll post the tickets once finished.

Hi

some small corrections:
* "Martin: Using the first response sending data. Is it really good to
   wait 200ms for the data"

   I think "good" should be "bad".

* Mark Stuart is from Pioneer Digital Design Ltd., not TUDelft.

There are a lot of promises of taking things to the list, but only chunk 
addressing has been. Please start the appropriate discussions so we can 
move the text forward.

CU,
      Arno
_______________________________________________
ppsp mailing list
ppsp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email