Re: [precis] meeting in Prague?

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 28 May 2015 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C231A893C for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pqZpM2prFU5H for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3EC1A001B for <precis@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so43702664igb.0 for <precis@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lc6qg6nQW69USr6HT1QiAVH8n6Nl2yBFpCYLFS38y1w=; b=K1b0BAHAtDBx7Mehd8GJ/wQu9ZnJnzk/gDGqLP4lc9/WR4TN2yIrJ4jvsP0WErGfol 099rW97PH98dtNLjBpJDPzmhTda6YtQ5Y8UKkJUIkjVa8t8M8F4zl3cal0ECvInfcvAc EBGCEg0jj41kkDkYSNlG93t01cidp4u2Sgl/vwoKFdLuOu5WwvRwAJ6iDJ8NSv0BKdTU kV03ILX9TP80gYqYlqHyNbA7ksnuSLQPP++3bIhmxCKdPK8r0mF4heT1wFhvZ/TSSgdT pwSgUw88DEo6tn43//z247FTN885LwFsctdYYHkOuq3Uzat3KuEr1yyOc5raa/0YGtC8 MpxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRPzYLmIe15lO+y3IRd4hCWDtyTPfAVfuJpsw8xUOG8OAiKOYTqQlKwIicXiCzPJyr5afF
X-Received: by 10.50.117.106 with SMTP id kd10mr15632661igb.24.1432830684709; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vk8sm4644907igb.4.2015.05.28.09.31.22 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 May 2015 09:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <556742D8.4060902@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:31:20 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, precis@ietf.org
References: <C6288C15-F5E9-486D-850C-E0E2FE779C93@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <C6288C15-F5E9-486D-850C-E0E2FE779C93@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/3FifoVyF0iX9FLo419iWu9vBS84>
Subject: Re: [precis] meeting in Prague?
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:31:26 -0000

On 5/28/15 10:10 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> The co-chairs do not currently plan to request a meeting slot for next
> IETF in Prague. Do people have any topic to discuss that requires f2f
> time in Prague?

Hi Marc!

Well, our documents are moving forward:

RFC 7564 has been published
draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis was approved on the IESG telechat today
draft-ietf-precis-nickname is waiting on a shepherd writeup
draft-ietf-precis-mappings has finished WGLC

So that's progress!

I suppose we could have a discussion in Prague about next steps, 
especially how we can encourage other application protocols (Stringprep 
"customers") to migrate to PRECIS. We've somewhat expected that to 
happen after the PRECIS WG closes down, so there are perhaps some 
logistical and expert review issues to figure out.

Peter