IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [precis] Test Vectors

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Thu, 05 May 2016 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C1512D0EA for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samwhited.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSxzs5ysdXEI for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556A012B074 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f74so33573255qge.2 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; s=swgoo; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sqWISlrCcP2ah58cZnTwdOKXPuqcTRlD6BfbZcveJbU=; b=vjHrSGbu0lt6FPPjhQedJVMNUUrmBIWuyDuc4TKAcTO9/qYV0OGZa15be9PMWJ6+qV WkzpARFLhzRx1QMqpV0CTiIisCDCbsWj9NsyNwoX4g7wncFc1IwXnvK/D8vo7ukDVyDE vYhvfqCnnmGn9kn1MTwTz32MuQdOzLTAfLTZE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sqWISlrCcP2ah58cZnTwdOKXPuqcTRlD6BfbZcveJbU=; b=PLwjhWb7nKsTDxcEQqUVsLEETlkUkN0jixUsuYGjlgkfnbSYfC50i0gPOCWb3xt9Ha QScfYQoWCOErmG8JTS1oPUfNg8pumLHcw27i23tPlndDu5ybkQuQptpTOlevLZOXW+aI stlKYrQnB2wGOtLboGIFYb1OKblIqBpe+ce3VxgOdxq+Vq1p9fYsgZDy4YkyRfSRXEEB 8SNEyzYdU6FM8p6XicVJimbX92tBoIBkhtyLJ/OugNoNVWgsDkuhGdx10FqdJXlaAsLS 7vxdj587sX1sUM+NY8CgLcqGed09oBIS7mrbcbJkd8ao4iWGnURRsFdN2gKuJeV8qlSp fwxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV0CZg1bqCRZ2g1UZWqz6l7ToKINvIGiRgZ1kY9GpVz7uO3Xyu1ijPngDu2wWSWJhZmZw5G9YkT2Y0FGw==
X-Received: by 10.140.101.137 with SMTP id u9mr11643062qge.92.1462413887099; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.197.132 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [208.54.86.205]
In-Reply-To: <572A39EC.8070204@stpeter.im>
References: <CAHbk4RJUAxXz6bnp97hTh2zY8hYRG9iF-ABX3G8SV6hEEWMcWA@mail.gmail.com> <572A39EC.8070204@stpeter.im>
From: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 21:04:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbk4R+8xbN1bW_-wk40-uZoWbNvf-odbuQzwwjvXjqejaiXfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/7H3TCA41W4aXwlHapSY4AOzULaw>
Cc: precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Test Vectors
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:04:50 -0000

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> This sounds useful. Submitting it as an individual Internet-Draft
> (draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00) is the best first step. That enables
> the working group to determine if the document is suitable for adoption as a
> working group item. I'd be happy to help you in your work on this document.

Thanks Peter,

I've started outlining a draft here:
http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-token.nroff

Best,
Sam


-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
https://blog.samwhited.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email