Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 02 September 2015 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D001B4994 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vZKBtzmJRQR for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF201B4967 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcpb10 with SMTP id pb10so2193818igc.1 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UYYCLOXH4CNIqVPJLUtRMeYXZKOfvQs9v2pSF88oQ3Y=; b=G+zyEuGvOrtElH+hY5dr0bnPuBr1nh5F/T3DBtdL53JIf1wdN9lC+ltWCYORRErgek x6Pm9ex29VlDokTOIS5LgDtZvejWJzJSUW/mcJNyTeHrJ4/fRIYUrdJqSTB4aknHXqmo EtFCQG237hs2fL7IBkK33m5xwVfL3mvnaVOJczf+ygp3T2Cqw7krqOrngp6bs0+YJV7A Nv/sCNlLtAddM9vQFodsqYjgh7g4mJ+B85Sjl7YAYIyEMYtztu/9TLBtmB895f7AUznJ 5npiuTyvNjPWAjIJiWDcZnMd5o5dO0/ShP6yskLSmi0BO15agIuaIFygK4s4c5NIiWti SkAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxsYIi3y8pxqTemFbxSIPHtTGCwS3Q2XPBIbUaYYialaJ+sToKfl+QH/KfyZ4hL9b79q/J
X-Received: by 10.50.18.40 with SMTP id t8mr7599959igd.57.1441237393894; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:95e9:2445:47d:81c6]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm3554730igt.2.2015.09.02.16.43.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150902220443.12714.44152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55E77FEE.8050209@andyet.net> <55E780DE.6060402@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Message-ID: <55E7898F.4070405@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:43:11 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E780DE.6060402@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/9HQM_PS5nWLMfCvPWyFeza1bWJM>
Cc: draft-ietf-precis-mappings.ad@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings.shepherd@ietf.org, stpeter@jabber.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings@ietf.org, precis-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:43:16 -0000

On 9/2/15 5:06 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 03/09/15 00:02, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>>>
>>> - The write-up didn't tell me if this is likely to be
>>> considered as neutral by the Unicode folks, or as
>>> something non-neutral. I'm curious about that, but not
>>> concerned much. I do think the IESG should be aware
>>> though if this is something that might cause e.g.
>>> liaison fun for the IAB later on.  (I'm not saying I
>>> think it does/would btw, just that I'd like to know if
>>> it might.)
>>
>> What do you mean by "neutral"?
>
> So I was being too oblique eh:-) Not something I'm good at
> I guess.
>
> I'm wondering if this contains anything about which they'd
> go ballistic.

I'm just a lowly shepherd, but I don't think so...